User talk:TOttenville8

Hello User:TOttenville8. Do you live here on Staten Island? Your contributions are most welcome.

I don't know what you call things down in Tottenville, but here in New Dorp we call this area the "South Shore". The history books all agree with me too about the location of the Oude Dorp settlement. Granted we're not as far south as Tottenville, but we I've never heard anyone use the term "East Shore", let alone as applied to around here.

Keep up the good work --- Decumanus 09:57, 1 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Hey TOttenville8. Good edits. I adjusted your wording on South Shore. My experience here since 1989, first in Annadale, and now farther north is that the demographically term is broader than you described. Just took our cat to the "South Shore Animal Hospital" on New Dorp Lane,for example. When I taught at Monsignor Farrel HS, I once asked my students how many were from the South Shore and everyone south of Midland Beach said "South Shore" (part of an in-class geography exercise). Perhaps the term has expanded over the years from what it once was, but in both case, everyone called in "South Shore", but it seems like now SI is basically North Shore/South Shore/Mall as far as major divisions. My ex-wife has been here since she was a girl (came over after from Brooklyn via after the VN Bridge), though, and I asked her about the term. Aunt and Uncle lived in Willowbrook and always asked how things were on the "South Shore", before they moved to Jersey, of course. Also the racial mix has changed some, even since 1989. Mostly still white of course. I notice some web sites use "Mid Island" but I've never heard anyone ever use that term in speech. It's mainly an artifact of the real estate industry, I think. It's definitely not a term I've heard people using about where they live, or in business names. If someone said that, I would personally assume they mean they lived by the Mall. Anyway, it's an interesting topic, don't you think? I'm very glad there --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 21:57, 9 December 2005 (UTC)is someone else who likes writing about Staten Island on Wikipedia.[reply]

By the way, fantastic job on the Greenbelt edit! I would like to see the creation part of it expanded too. -- Decumanus 16:37, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Hi User:TOttenville8 I really appreciate that someone does good edits on Climate but could you please try to not spam the History of that page? From 12 feb. until 16th you have made over 50 edits, most of them minor ones. Maybe you could use the Preview button a bit more, or do your edits loacally first and then save them once or twice a day? I don't have a big problem with this but I think it would be nice for new users to also see some of the older contributors in the History page. Keep up the good work! --Dittaeva 10:21, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)

--- Why do you beleive that postage stamps from Republika Srpska were banned in the U.S.? I couldn't find anything about this online. Rmhermen 00:21, Mar 21, 2004 (UTC)

Back around 1994-95 or so I tried to buy some at this place in downtown San Francisco, and the stamp dealer told me he couldn't get any for me since the sale of the items had been banned in the United States by order of the federal government (I went looking for them after seeing a newspaper article about the "renegade" Bosnian Serb government and the article included a picture showing one or two of the stamps). I'm sure they're probably not banned any more.

Hi :) You don't need to make redirects for plurals. Just change [[Eskimos]] in the article text to [[Eskimo]]s. It'll do the same thing, and it'll look the same - Eskimos.

Thanks Dysprosia 12:30, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Monte Dinero

Hi, I have comments about the article you wrote about Monte Dinero.

First of all, you said Monte Dinero is located on the Strait of Magellan. This phrase could cause confussion, because you said Monte Dinero is in Argentina and the sovereignity of the Strait (sea and costaline on both sides belong to Chile). So Monte Dinero could be at Chilean- Argentinian border, with the peak in Argetina's side (so could be considered in Argentina, like the Aconcagua), or could be located completely in Argentinian side. In the last case, it would more precisely to write that te mount is located near the Strait of Magellan rather on the Strait of Magellan (we chileans are very sensitive about this topic).

Also, i don't know if the lighthouse you refer it's the chilean lighthouse of Punta Dungeness (towards the Strait), or you mentioned a lighthouse in Argentinian side (towards The Atlantic i guess, i don't know if there exists). Besides there are many lighthouses soth this location: i think the southernmost lighthouse is located on Cap Horn. Baloo rch 23:32, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I found your edit to Gun politics in the US to be extremely POV and I have reverted it. Please do not refer to groups as extremists, and please provide citations for which groups regard blacks as criminals and whites as law-abiding citizens. --"DICK" CHENEY 14:09, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Michael Luther King

I've changed the article to remove this. There is a longer discussion about it at Talk:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr.#.26bull.3B_Michael_Luther_King.2C_Jr..3F, but the short version is shown in this quote from MLK, Sr.:

I had been known as Michael Luther King or "Mike" up until I was 22 . . . when one day my father, James Albert King, told me: 'You aren't named Mike or Michael either. Your name is Martin Luther King. Your mother just called you Mike for short.' I was elated to know that I had really been named for the great leader of the Protestant Reformation, but there was no way of knowing if papa had made a mistake after all. Neither of my parents could read or write and they kept no record of Negro births in our backwoods county . . . I gladly accepted Martin Luther King as my real name and when M.L. was born, I proudly named him Martin Luther King, Jr. But it was not until 1934, when I was seeking my first passport . . . that I found out that Dr. Johnson, who delivered M.L., had listed him in the city records as Michael Luther King, Jr., because he thought that was my real name.

So even if the father's legal name was Michael for a time, his son was always Martin.

Thanks, BCorr|Брайен 16:38, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Prison

What is the source for your assertion of the difference between Prison and Jail? And would you consider moving the explanation to the Prison in the US section, since concepts of misdemeanor and felony are peculiarly American, whilst the enyclopedia is peruliarly international. I have to tell you that the Prison / Jail explanation makes no sense to me from a UK perspective, and does not reflect my understanding. --Tagishsimon

First Division

Excellent article. It's hard to imagine such good insight into old-time baseball from someone your age. I've tried to explain it to someone about your age before, and failed, even though I'm only slightly older. Historical sports terms need to be preserved.

I even agree with your adding "Criticism of salary caps". While I had put in the basics about the effects, older players being forced to retire or leave, regardless of their past role on the team, etc., I think that you added something needed to the effect that lots of people don't like this. (I basically favor it -- it's the main reason I can still afford a partial NFL season ticket, which would have gotten beyond my means were it not for the salary cap and if pay had continued to escalate at the rate it had from about 1981 to 1994.)

Limbaugh's opposition, however, needs to be seen in the light of how he has often admitted that the NFL is the "world's only example of socialism that works". The NFL has more impact on younger fans especially than other sports, largely because almost everyone can believe at the start of the year that their team at least has some chance of appearing in the post-season, which is hardly the case in some of the other sports with regards to some of their teams.

Rlquall 12:09, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Did you know has been updated

and a fact from the article Curse of Billy Penn, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you have another interesting fact to submit, then please suggest it at the section's talk page.

--[[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 08:32, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Why not? I'd be happy to agree to it. TOttenville8

Holy Cross Day

Hey, there. Nice work on the Holy Cross Day page, but there's a problem with the title. "Holy Cross Day" is not used in the Orthodox Church, and is, as you say, more a modern popular usage than an official title. What would you think of having "Holy Cross Day", "Exaltation of the Cross", "Veneration of the Cross", "Triumph of the Cross", "Invention of the Cross" and anything else we can think of all redirect to a page titled "Feast of the Cross", where we could discuss the various feasts without giving inappropriate preference to any particular usage? JHCC 19:29, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Got your email. I think just "Feast of the Cross" is best (we can put the Sept 14th date in the first sentence, so that's clear), since that can cover both the Sept & May dates and no-one is likely to be looking up "September 14 Feast of the Cross". I've gone ahead and moved the page to "Feast of the Cross" and will edit the text a bit and create some redirect pages. BTW, probably best to keep this discussion on the talk page for the article; that way other contributors can see what we're doing and make suggestions there. Thanks. JHCC 14:50, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Revanchism

What is this nonsense you put in Revanchism? Arabs were generally neutral during WW2, and of those who WERE involved, the vast majority fought on the side of the Allies (to speak nothing of the use of the in this context too generalized term "Arabs"). -- Dissident (Talk) 03:39, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

WikiProject New York City

Hello, I've started WikiProject New York City, and from your edits it seems you might be interested. See its talk page for the beginning of a discussion on the standardization of neighborhood names, and bringing New York City up to featured status.--Pharos 14:02, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Astrology

An attempt is being made to remove all content on astrology from the articles on planets. If you have time, please review the entry on Venus and put it on your watchlist. ShutterBugTrekker 16:47, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Looked at the article, and didn't find any astrological references still there; I did make an edit on the "Ruling Planets" article to correct a few minor ambiguitiues. TOttenville8 10:10, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

MS Saint Louis

Two comments. First, what is "bolt in" in the context of an election? Second, as the user on its discussion page suggested, can you provide a source for this? Thanks, Avriette 00:34, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Round-robin tournament

I've merged & redirected a page of yours, Round-robin tournament, to Round-robin (sports). If you approve, say so on Talk:Round-robin (sports) to get the latter renamed to the former. (Or if you're an admin, you could do it yourself ;) ) Thanks, Joestynes 11:43, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Burglary

Your statements of...

"Many other U.S. states treat burglary as a more serious crime when it occurs at night; California, for example, prosecutes nighttime burglary as "burglary in the first degree" and daytime burglary as "burglary in the second degree," under most circumstances."

on the burglary page are incorrect

Night-time has nothing to do with the difference between 1st degree burglary and 2nd degree burglary. I erased your incorrect facts and replaced them with the proper, factual definitions of first and second degree burglary. My comments were deleted almost immediately by an administrator named Ahoerstemeier. I do not understand why an administrator of this site would rather have false information over factual statements on the website.

The information I provided that was deleted was:

"Burglary is entering any habitable structure with the intent of A. commiting larceny(theft), whether it be petty or grand, or B. any felony. If there is no intent upon entering the structure, there is no burglary. First degree burglary in California is reserved for any burglary to a residential structure e.g. house, apartment. Second degree burglary is all other types of burglary, e.g. businesses, vehicles, containers."

You can find the definitions of first and second degree burglary in the California Penal Code section 460:

460. (a) Every burglary of an inhabited dwelling house, vessel, as defined in the Harbors and Navigation Code, which is inhabited and designed for habitation, floating home, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 18075.55 of the Health and Safety Code, or trailer coach, as defined by the Vehicle Code, or the inhabited portion of any other building, is burglary of the first degree.

  (b) All other kinds of burglary are of the second degree.
  (c) This section shall not be construed to supersede or affect

Section 464 of the Penal Code.

The information stated therein confirms my statements and disproves yours.

Please contact the administrator so that my correct additions to the site will replace your misleading infactual statements.

Thank You

lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 17:30, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

Sources for Mesothermal

Hello, some time ago you added a fair bit of content to Mesothermal. As you may be aware, we are currently trying to improve Wikipedia's verifiability and reliability by making sure articles cite the sources used to create them. Do you remember what websites, books, or other sources you used to add content to Mesothermal? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? See WP:CITET for some quick templates to use for citing sources. Thanks! --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 21:57, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your WP:NA entry

Greetings, editor! Your name appears on Wikipedia:List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct:

If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! bd2412 T 04:34, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maly Trostenets extermination camp

I have now significantly expanded the Maly Trostenets extermination camp article with bibliographical references, etc., and although I am not (I must stress) an expert in Holocaust studies I feel, upon the review of the literature on the subject, that the article would profit from being retitled, i.e. in effect moved to a new page under the heading ‘Trostenez extermination camp’, as this seems to be the emerging naming consensus within the scholarly community (which shies away from a pure geographical reference: see the added bibliographical references). In this case, apart from the established conventions in Holocaust studies, such a change seems warranted by the circumstance that the geographical place-name in question has always been used rather loosely, in that most of the crimes committed at the place actually were carried out both outside of the village of Maly Trosenets (in its Russian spelling) and outside of the camp associated with it — namely, in the nearby forests of Blagovshchina and Shashkovka (as I have now indicated in the article). Trostenez (in its German vocalization) is thus something of a figurative name, rather than a geographical one. I wonder if, as the original author of the article, you would have any objections to the proposed move (objections which I would respect). — Prof02 05:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your response on my talkpage. I am still consulting experts on the subject, and will, I feel, have to give this matter some more thought. — Prof02 06:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Charity care

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charity care, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Pastordavid 20:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth Reich

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fourth Reich, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Fourth Reich. clpo13_(talk) 00:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Generation Jones

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Generation Jones. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation Jones (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:21, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 12:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello TOttenville8! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 138 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Marc Morial - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Identity cleansing

The article Identity cleansing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is highly pov, attacking only now independent Serbia, for something that was disputed during Yugoslavia time. Serbia is not only responsible for all Yugoslavia problems. Also, only one source is disputed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tadija (talk) 15:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Communist front

An article that you have been involved in editing, Communist front, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Cerejota (talk) 05:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andagoya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andagoya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andagoya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:23, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rankin Inlet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baker Lake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TOttenville8. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your article : Display Handicap

Wanted to say thank you for the very good work in creating the Display Handicap article, an event from a three decades ago. I'm big on documenting old but important races that are no longer run as well as those at the defunct tracks. The work you did gave any reader a full understanding and served Wikipedia well. Stretchrunner (talk) 02:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Majoritarian" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Majoritarian. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 26#Majoritarian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abolition of Prussia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palatinate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statute of Westminster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Call For Action for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Call For Action is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call For Action until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 02:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

False claims of references

Falsely claiming you're adding a reference when adding unreferenced material is not acceptable. — kwami (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My reply: Go to hell.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herschel Walker, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bill Johnson and Gary Anderson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dosage Index for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dosage Index is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dosage Index until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 16:45, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]